57modell skrev:
Jeg er uenig. Jeg er henvist til akseptere at andre mennesker er intelligente. Det vil være feil av meg og alle og enhver å legge til grunn at alle er uintelligente og ikke tåler å se det som faktisk eksisterer. Jeg kan opplyse deg om at enhver butikk i Norge, og forsåvidt kloden rundt, som fører ukeblader, tidsskrifter og bøker, formidler hva det skal være av informasjon uten å ha sjekket opp innholdets gyldighet og gangbarhet.
Jeg opplevde i fjor høst å se en hel programserie på National Geographic Channel TV som var basert på løgn, det vil si pur propaganda for blant annet internasjonale korporasjoners kommunistiske og fascistiske agenda. Jeg tålte det og er nødt til regne med at også andre tålte det, det vil si det er ikke opp til meg og bestemme hva andre skal lese og se, og ikke lese og se. Legg alt på bordet og la folk flest vurdere innholdet. Det er ønskelig å sette en aldersgrense på mye av det, men det er ikke praktisk mulig.
57modell
That's silly. There are plenty of imbeciles in the world and their IQ is irellevant, so when you direct people to the sites you posted, only imbeciles and bigots eat it all up without a second thought and spread the word to the rest of their own kind. In my view, that is dangerous and it is no different than what drives those who join KKK where weak individuals are convinced by others to hate. Those who view life with a bit of rational thought go elsewhere than to those places you suggested to learn the facts of life.
It has nothing to do with whether one can 'withstand' the suggestive material such as the Natl. Geo. program you refer to. That's a 'one-time' deal. But this obvious and intense desire to connect Obama again and again to what many consider to be the least appealing of other people in our society, is a different agenda. It is intended to destroy one person - and one person only - Obama - and I find it unacceptable.
Obama has been elected President of the United States, but Globetrotter wants us to believe ( and now you seem to be following in his footsteps by your suggestions) that he is totally unacceptable as an honorable person based on claims he has lied about all sorts of important matters, and that he keeps undesirable company and is unsuitable to lead this country.
If we accept Globetrotters claims, then we have to assume that those in our government in charge of vetting Obama to ensure he is qualified in all the ways that matters, is deliberately deceiving the people of this country - or - are themselves unqualified for the job of vetting.
But we're supposed to consider, and even believe, that Globetrotter's opinions of Obama is the truth? Furthermore, that the webistes you suggest, posted by mostly whackos fueled by hatred, are possibilities of truth, and that all of this should be considered despite our own government's acceptance of Obama as a qualified leader of this country ????
You both need a few sessions 'on the couch.'
Come Tuesday, the man will be the President of the United States. Let your dislikes, disappointments, disbeliefs, distrust and whatever else you feel rest. Let the man do his job, sit back and watch him fail or succeed.